Search for: "SPENCER v. SPENCER" Results 661 - 680 of 1,276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
I'm learning more and more about the details of Hawaii criminal law.Before this opinion, I wouldn't have thought that a conviction in Hawaii for "criminal property damage in the first degree" was anything near as dangerous as "burglary of a dwelling, arson or extortion" or a crime that "involves the use of explosives." [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm by Joe Patrice
In the words of the inimitable Spencer Hall, “But what about a gun that FIRES tampons, Texas? [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:59 am by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:59 am by Barry Sookman
Yitzhak (C 46636-07-11) Coward v Phaestos Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 1292 (Ch) (17 May 2013) Fairstar Heavy Transport NV v Adkins & Anor[2012] EWHC 2952 (01 November 2012) Football Dataco Ltd & Ors v Stan James Plc & Ors[2013] EWCA Civ 27 (06 February 2013) Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc[2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch) (21 May 2013) Martin & Ors Gabriele v Giambrone P/A Giambrone & Law [2013] NIQB 48 (5 March 2013) McKeogh… [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:26 pm
  Spencer's one-year deadline ends on Saturday, November 13th. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:33 am
Referring to the recent outbreak of authoritative case law on survey evidence in Interflora v Marks & Spencer (noted by the IPKat here), Birss J refused the application.This Kat prefersZZZ to Zee In the learned judge's view, it was obvious that the evidence sought to be adduced would not be all the evidence that Zee Entertainment would be relying on it its claim. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:15 pm by KC Johnson
As Yahoo’s Dan Wetzel perceptively observed, although the NCAA is the named defendant in the lawsuit, a better title would be “Paterno v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:43 am by Huw Morris
At the end of last month, the long-awaited judgment in the Interflora v Marks and Spencer case on trade mark infringement as it relates to keyword advertising was delivered by Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Despite ACA’ amendments to HIPAA’s bona fide wellness program rules and the 11th Circuit’s rejection of an EEOC challenge in Broward County v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:45 am
The IPKat does some fieldresearch into flowers ...Connoisseurs of long judgments will know that Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer Plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch) was decided last Monday, 21 May 2013, in the Chancery Division, High Court of Justice, England and Wales, by (who else?) [read post]