Search for: "STAND et al. v. STATE." Results 661 - 680 of 2,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2010, 8:25 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A similar conclusion was reached today in Black et al. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 2:43 pm
Geithner, et al., a petition to review a decision by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 8:15 am
  The Fifth Circuit's decision follows closely on the heels of the Second Circuit's recent decision in State of Connecticut et al. v. [read post]
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Georgia Department of Education, et al., 48 IDELR 279 (N.D.Ga.2007), the court dismissed the case brought against various state agencies within the State of Georgia by a parent attorney who had tried and failed to use the same tactics against the same state agencies twice before. [read post]
16 May 2022, 6:57 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Mendota Heights Dental Center, et al., No. 21-998.The question presented is: “Whether the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq., preempts a state workers’ compensation order that compels an employer to reimburse an employee for the cost of marijuana used in response to pain arising from a work-related injury. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 5:12 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
It is not a case that draws much attention from higher education circles, but the case of WNET et al. v Aereo has drawn an amicus brief that should worry anyone who is interested in how copyright law serves or inhibits innovation and competition. [read post]