Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
[OK, if you say so, though I kind of thought the restraints on states’ abrogation of contracts, ex post facto laws, etc. were mandatory and ©/patent were optional.] [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:34 pm
At the end of its January term, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to take on this contentious issue, allowing a petition for leave to appeal in The People ex rel. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:34 pm
At the end of its January term, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to take on this contentious issue, allowing a petition for leave to appeal in The People ex rel. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:07 am
Oklahoma ex rel. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:02 am
Newly Published Cases for Explanation or Comment ZA Council v MT & Ors [2017] EWFC 12 (14 February 2017): An interesting example of extensive redaction This is the published judgment of a decision by Moor J sitting as a High Court Judge in the Family Court. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 12:18 pm
Oklahoma ex rel. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 12:18 pm
Oklahoma ex rel. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
(Messenger ex rel. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:52 pm
” If this sounds familiar, it is because the legal argument advanced by the Independence Institute is parallel to the reasoning adopted by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in its opinion ending the John Doe Investigation (State ex rel. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
Then, after the Supreme Court decision, the court of appeals found that preclusion from the TTAB ruling did apply, meaning that Hargis was an infringer. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:20 pm
On February 14, the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion in United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:11 am
” (quoting Mason ex rel. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:48 am
Rather, looking to the plain language of the relevant FCA provision, the appeals court followed the Fifth and Sixth Circuits, and held the attorney general has absolute veto power over voluntary qui tam settlements (U.S. ex rel Michaels and Whitesides v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 11:29 am
As expected after oral arguments, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals declined to decide whether parties may use statistical sampling to prove False Claims Act liability in United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
It is certainly true that the federal government implored the court to allow the appeal. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 7:52 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:08 am
Reversing in part, the appeals court also addressed two other issues of first impression, holding that the AKA requires proof of a link between the kickback and a specific instance of favorable treatment and that, for purposes of the statute of limitations, the government’s AKA claim related back to the relators’ original qui tam complaint under the False Claims Act (United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:32 am
Okla. ex rel. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:00 am
Deeds ex rel. [read post]
