Search for: "STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 661 - 680
of 937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2007, 10:56 am
The protocol, the most commonly used in the nation, involves the sequential application of sodiuim thiopental, pancuronium bromide and potassium chloride -- first adopted in Oklahoma in 1977 but first used in Texas in 1982. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
Below the states are broken down into four categories based upon such criteria. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Among these states, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin expressly allow recovery of filial consortium damages pursuant to statute. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
" Last January, in State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
Here’s a sampling: The states of Michigan, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin: The brief argues that the state “coerces political speech when it requires government employees to pay for public-sector bargaining. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
Here’s a sampling: The states of Michigan, Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin: The brief argues that the state “coerces political speech when it requires government employees to pay for public-sector bargaining. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 7:34 am
My state, Oklahoma, follows this rule, holding that “the insurer has the burden of showing that a loss falls within an exclusionary clause of the policy…[and,] in case of doubt, exclusions . . . are construed strictly against the insurer. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Supreme Court held in Gregg v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:05 am
(in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-308 Case name: United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 4:43 pm
ETOregon State (24) v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
Oklahoma,” which is now being briefed for argument in the fall. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
State, Baldwin v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 12:24 pm
Crossen v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Department of State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 6:31 am
Litigants have recently challenged Oklahoma’s anti-abortion exceptions on state constitutional grounds, including patients’ rights to life and liberty. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:28 am
Federal courts in Texas, Arkansas, Tennessee, Oklahoma and Alabama have enjoined those states’ emergency orders banning non-essential medical procedures to the extent that they covered abortions. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Fourth, United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:24 am
In their brief, Attorneys General from Texas, Alabama, Colorado, Idaho, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Washington argue that child rape has a devastating effect on society. [read post]
