Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 661 - 680
of 41,370
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Collins v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Collins v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 11:20 am
This week, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Moore v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:47 pm
" State political subdivisions are "merely ... department[s] of the State, and the State may withhold, grant or withdraw powers and privileges as it sees fit. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 2:00 pm
(U.S.S.C., April 24, 2018, Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:26 pm
In that earlier case, Coleman v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
“Gibbons v. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 9:22 am
Case citation: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 9:42 am
Bode or State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 5:21 am
United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
Defenders of local power will need to invoke NFIB v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:55 am
The state bar’s Board of Governors on December 10 adopted a legislative position against any effort to alter the Supreme Court’s rule making power: Opposes amendment of Article V, Section 2(a) of the Florida Constitution that would alter the Supreme Court’s authority to adopt rules for practice and procedure in all courts, or that would change the manner by which such rules may be repealed by the Legislature. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
In Strange v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
Florida, 517 U.S. 44 (1995), the Supreme Court held 5-4 that Congress lacked power under Article I of the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 2:54 pm
Background In Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc., v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 12:02 pm
– United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:13 pm
Shirley V. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:43 am
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 8:21 pm
The validity of the inherent contempt power was upheld in the early Supreme Court decision in Anderson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 7:58 am
Stemming from this silence, came two decisions that addressed the issue, albeit with different results; the first, Matter of Goetz, 8 Misc 3d 200 (Sur Ct, Westchester County 2005), in the context of a revocable trust, and the second, Matter of Perosi v. [read post]
