Search for: "STATE v FRANK"
Results 661 - 680
of 4,746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2012, 8:22 pm
Circuit extended the Court's previous holding on False Claims Act damages announced last year in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Olden v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2010] EWCA Civ 143 (26 February 2010) Mohamed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Civ 158 (26 February 2010) LG, R (on the application of) v Independent Appeal Panel for Tom Hood School & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 142 (26 February 2010) Mann v Northern Electric Distribution Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 141 (26 February… [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 5:37 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:37 am
In Mortensen v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:34 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:11 pm
" That stately language is not upsetting to most people. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:02 pm
For such a short and unanimous opinion, Jones v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:06 pm
The Spencer v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:24 pm
Supreme Court issued a per curiam opinion today vacating a Ninth Circuit judgment in Frank v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:35 pm
111-203, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), is authority to issue regulations and take enforcement actions under the two major federal statutes that specify conditions under which customer financial information may be shared by financial institutions: Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA, P.L. 106-102) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 7:49 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 5:03 pm
I've been meaning to blog about all the recent coverage that the case - Papadopoulos v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
Last week, in Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:02 am
In late February, UC-Irvine Law School Dean Erwin Chemerinsky came to Tempe to deliver the annual John Frank Lecture at Arizona State University. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 12:48 am
" Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 5:00 am
The district court concluded that the employee was not a whistleblower under the Dodd-Frank Act and thus did not state a claim for retaliation. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 6:04 pm
Vanguard is fighting his retaliation suit because, among other reasons, he did not report misconduct to the SEC, but the agency maintains that such external reporting is not a prerequisite to a Dodd-Frank claim (Danon v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:22 am
No big surprise there, as Snider v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:44 pm
As Judge Levin pointed in Morefield v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
