Search for: "STATE v. KELLER" Results 661 - 680 of 706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Activision (musicians in interactive music video game have no claim); Keller v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 10:24 am by Eric Goldman
* From India: The Supreme Court of India today directed Google, Yahoo and Microsoft to set up an in-house mechanism to remove online search results, which has “potential to go counter”to Section 22 of the Pre-Conception & Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994 (Act). * Techdirt: Feds Say Jewelry Company CEO Scrubbed Google Results With Fake Court Orders And Forged Judge’s Signatures * In IMDb v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am by David Pozen
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am by admin
Keller, “The pregnant person,” 68 J. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
No, (probably) said the Appellate Division, First Department, in its April 6, 2017 decision in Keller-Goldman v. [read post]