Search for: "STATE v. MCDONALD" Results 661 - 680 of 1,990
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2017, 10:41 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
The court granted McDonald’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing the wage and hour lawsuit against the company (Salazar v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(Bankruptcy; Tribal Sovereign Immunity)United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am by Jamie Baker
(February 2017 Update) Sally McDonald Henry, Paying-to-Play in Chapter 11, 17 J. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
The justices issued an opinion on Wednesday in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am by Mark Walsh
” The case of Martinez-Hidalgo v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
McDonald J confirmed that given the gravity of the issue in dispute, it [was] not appropriate for the local authority simply to … consent to immunisation pursuant to the provisions of s 33(3) of the Children Act 1989 on the basis of its shared parental responsibility for SL under the interim care order (see A Local Authority v SB, AB & MB) [2010] 2 FLR 1203 and Re Jake (Withholding Medical Treatment) [2015] EWHC 2442 (Fam)). [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 10:34 am by Florian Mueller
I hope the decision-makers at those companies will focus not only on their employees from and customers in certain countries but also appreciate the President's efforts to protect them.Thankfully, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has published several documents relating to State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:30 am by Walter Olson
Agency interpretive letters are the wrong way to enact new federal law [Ilya Shapiro and David McDonald on Cato amicus in school bathroom case, Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 5:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Judge Rovner, who generally takes a narrower view of Second Amendment protections than does the majority, agreed with the bottom line but wrote separately: To the extent that McDonald v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:11 am by MBettman
McDonald’s Corp., 101 Ohio App.3d 294, 300, 655 N.E.2d 440 (9th Dist.1995). [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and David McDonald discuss Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]