Search for: "STATE v. MILES" Results 661 - 680 of 4,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2012, 5:53 am by Joe Koncelik
  The Court found that the wells distance from the plant - from five hundred feet to eight miles- meant the source were not "adjacent' for purposes of treating them as a single source under Title V. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:08 am by Vicki Shiah
  The Homer City Station plant is a 1,884 megawatt electric power plant located 50 miles west of Pittsburgh. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:27 pm by Richard Burt
The Delaware court had previously decided a similar matter in Ascension Insurance Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:00 pm by Eduardo Ustaran
These will include the territorial scope of the GDPR (Article 3) and international data transfers (Chapter V), on which the three bodies largely agree. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
Although decided over two decades apart, United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:35 pm by Abbe Gluck
I have a new piece at Politico that follows up on the federalism arguments in King v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:43 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:LectureFleur Johns, International Law and the Provocations of the Digital: The 2021 Annual Kirby Lecture in International Law Special Issue In Honour of Judge James CrawfordDouglas Guilfoyle, Donald R Rothwell, & Margaret A Young, James Crawford: His Legacy and Impact on International Law in Australia and Globally Roman Kwiecień, The Formal Sources of International Law, the Relationship between Treaties and Custom, and the International Law-Making Process Alex Green, The… [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
The property lies more than 20 miles from the nearest highway. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:09 am
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 10:47 am by Karen Gullo
EFF’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeks to uncover information and provide the public with details about the agencies’ policies and procedures for warrantless GPS tracking.In United States v. [read post]