Search for: "STATE v. MURRAY" Results 661 - 680 of 1,314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2015, 1:47 am by umlaw
It's the moral commitment stated in our country's creed. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD810 .M63 v. 7Elizabeth Cooke, ed., Modern Studies in Property Law (Oxford: Hart Pub., 2013). [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
In the Court of Appeal, the court considered the development of the case law, especially the recent cases of Murray v Leisureplay Plc [2005] EWCA Civ 963 and El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV [2013] EWCA Civ 1539, stating (per Lord Justice Moore-Bick at paragraph 21): “[T]he modern cases thus appear to accept that a clause providing for payment on a breach of a sum of money that exceeds the amount that a court would award as compensation…may… [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
By contrast, in the United States (see Firth v New York, 747 NYS 2d 69 (2002)) and in England (see the notes to section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013), the single-publication rule means a cause of action accrues only when the material is first accessed. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
The state and territory borders are irrelevant to the media. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 5:48 pm
(NBC Photo) A very interesting trademark case from the Ninth Circuit today, Multi Time Machine, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
He also analysed Murray (which grapples with the effect of publication of children’s facial features) and held that it did not mandate a context-free assessment of whether there was a REP. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
He also analysed Murray (which grapples with the effect of publication of children’s facial features) and held that it did not mandate a context-free assessment of whether there was a REP. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
 Both Justice Raye and Justice Murray, however, also write concurring opinions. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 6:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
., Nova Scotia, Ontario, and Northwest Territories have all found these provisions as unconstitutional, culminating in the Supreme Court’s decision in R. v. [read post]