Search for: "Sharpe v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 2,598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Randy Marse, Jr.
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am by Liskow & Lewis
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson [2019] EWCA Civ 819. [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:06 am by CMS
It also brought into sharp focus that confiscation orders will not always be an effective tool in law enforcement’s fight against financial crime. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 9:56 am
Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), and Ashcroft v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Judgment In giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the Master of the Rolls and Lady Justice Sharp answered all four questions in the affirmative. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:57 pm by Shari Shapiro
EPA must have a sharp eye to measuring and articulating the costs and benefits of the state plans to reduce carbon emissions. [read post]