Search for: "Simpson v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Posted by David Katz and Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:30 am
” Berkson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
Frank V. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
Preston and Rex v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
Simpson, anyone?) [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 7:22 pm
Simpson would not have gotten away with abuse in New Jersey. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
In a 5-3 opinion (Justice Breyer recused himself) authored by Justice Kennedy,the Court, in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:23 am
Kronk's ex-wife (and a Chief in the United States Coast Guard), who states (1) he was interested in fanta [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 9:00 pm
DeBenedetto v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
However, I often find that time is an elusive concept and for me the “nearness” of Noble v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
Am. 481-530 (2010).Simpson, Brett. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:20 pm
First, in DeJohn v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
" New York's highest court, in Matter of Kelly v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:18 pm
First, in DeJohn v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
Macreath was represented at the Court of Session by Edinburgh law firm Simpson & Marwick, one of whose partners told MSPs at the Scottish Parliament HERE that ‘asbestos is good for you’. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Beale v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
Birnbaum, Jina Choi, and Haimavatha V. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 3:26 pm
(See, e.g., the 2 Live Crew case, Campbell v. [read post]
