Search for: "Smart v. United States"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 7:17 pm
Lucky 13 further claims that Swift had filed about sixty federal trademark applications with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:19 am
Ltd. v Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:19 am
Ltd. v Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:06 am
Except as provided in § 4–305 of the Correctional Services Article, if a person violates subsection (a)(1)(v) of this sectio [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:32 pm
EXCEPTION #1: LAW ENFORCEMENT It is legal to wear, carry, or transport a handgun if you are authorized as part of your official equipment, and you are: Law enforcement official of the United States, the State, or a county or city of the State; Member of the armed forces of the United States or of the National Guard on duty or traveling to or from duty; Law enforcement official of another state or subdivision of another state… [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 9:06 am
Exception #1: Law Enforcement It is legal to wear, carry, or transport a handgun if you are authorized as part of your official equipment, and you are: Law enforcement official of the United States, the State, or a county or city of the State; Member of the armed forces of the United States or of the National Guard on duty or traveling to or from duty; Law enforcement official of another state or subdivision of another state… [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
United States Research and Resources Privacy by Default, Abuse by Design: EU Competition Concerns About Apple’s New App Tracking Policy, Hausfeld Competition Bulletin, Spring 2021, Thomas Hoppner and Philipp Westerhoff, Technical University Wildau and Hausfeld RA LLP. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
My own inclination is toward the global and away from the edifices of the law state system and its international public law based architecture (e.g., Backer, Larry Catá, On the Evolution of the United Nations’ 'Protect-Respect-Remedy' Project: The State, the Corporation and Human Rights in a Global Governance Context (June 3, 2010). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
The persistent underfunding of indigent defense systems in the United States for the last 50 years has occurred on the watch of our state courts and our profession. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:54 am
California and United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm
Examples include: Evidence in the Doe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:09 am
A more recent decision on FRAND royalty calculation is Ericsson Inc v D-Link Sys., Inc 773 F. 3d 1201 (Fed. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 10:31 am
While the Jones Act does not specifically define the term “seaman,” the United States Supreme Court has established a two-pronged test to determine whether a party is a seaman under the Jones Act. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
The UK Government has relaunched the campaign to overhaul the Human Rights Act 1998 in an attempt to counter what Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Raab has called “wokery and political correctness. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:43 am
The second is that Judge Terry Doughty’s injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am
(PatLit) United States US General US Senator questions Constitutionality of ACTA (IP Watch) (Michael Geist) US IP rights holders hail new FTAs with Colombia, Panama, Korea (IP Watch) Telegram for the Federal Circuit: Electronic case filing is now available (Patently-O) US Patent Reform America Invents Act – Filing and disclosure strategies (IP Think Tank) America Invents: what do litigators need to know? [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:38 am
Pamela Corley, Amy Steigerwalt, & Artemus Ward, The Puzzle of Unanimity: Consensus on the United States Supreme Court (Stanford Law Books, May 2013) Drawing on data from the U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
This article will examine how United States courts have dealt with this problem. [read post]
