Search for: "Sparks v. Sparks" Results 661 - 680 of 1,989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2012, 5:52 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Friday, March 23, 2012: Air Canada cancels dozens of flights after wildcat strike in Toronto via@globeandmail Harper sets Canada, Thailand on path to free-trade agreement via@globeandmail Supreme Court ruling lets lawyers talk tough with judges Controversial Quebec lawyers return to practice Voter ID laws spark partisan controversy | The Ticket - Yahoo! [read post]
17 May 2012, 1:13 pm by Lawrence Solum
It then introduces two ideas with an eye toward sparking fresh thinking about the constitutionality of privatization: first, the notion that all actors exercising federal government power should be viewed along a constitutional continuum and not as occupying separate private/public spheres; and, second, that a democratic accountability principle may be derived from the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:37 am
The Supreme Court has ruled 8-1 that the First Amendment protects groups that organize anti-gay protests outside military funerals.The Snyder v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:10 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Wednesday, January 04, 2012: Ontario Court of Appeal Grants Amputee up to $1M of Benefits - Kusnierz v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
London housing prices would suggest otherwise, but the rejection of capitalism in favour of open-source, commons approaches sparks some interesting debates, says Nicola. * Are myth and metaphor the primary drivers of innovation in intellectual property law? [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Is it time to use Article V to amend Article V? [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
In today’s order list, the Texas Supreme Court denied the petition for review in Jerry Gurkoff, D.O. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 10:30 am by Howard Friedman
Prison rules allowed one audio entertainment device, and plaintiff chose a CD player.In Sparks v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:18 am by Andrew Trask
It also sparked a debate among circuit courts about when common issues predominate that all but guarantees the Supreme Court will weigh in again in the next year or two. (2) American Express Co. v. [read post]