Search for: "Spencer v Spencer"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2013, 2:30 pm
In the words of the inimitable Spencer Hall, “But what about a gun that FIRES tampons, Texas? [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
In the famous case R.A.V. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 11:52 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:59 am
In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:59 am
Yitzhak (C 46636-07-11) Coward v Phaestos Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 1292 (Ch) (17 May 2013) Fairstar Heavy Transport NV v Adkins & Anor[2012] EWHC 2952 (01 November 2012) Football Dataco Ltd & Ors v Stan James Plc & Ors[2013] EWCA Civ 27 (06 February 2013) Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc[2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch) (21 May 2013) Martin & Ors Gabriele v Giambrone P/A Giambrone & Law [2013] NIQB 48 (5 March 2013) McKeogh… [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:26 pm
Spencer's one-year deadline ends on Saturday, November 13th. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:33 am
Referring to the recent outbreak of authoritative case law on survey evidence in Interflora v Marks & Spencer (noted by the IPKat here), Birss J refused the application.This Kat prefersZZZ to Zee In the learned judge's view, it was obvious that the evidence sought to be adduced would not be all the evidence that Zee Entertainment would be relying on it its claim. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
” Spencer v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:15 pm
As Yahoo’s Dan Wetzel perceptively observed, although the NCAA is the named defendant in the lawsuit, a better title would be “Paterno v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:43 am
At the end of last month, the long-awaited judgment in the Interflora v Marks and Spencer case on trade mark infringement as it relates to keyword advertising was delivered by Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 10:15 am
Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:51 pm
Despite ACA’ amendments to HIPAA’s bona fide wellness program rules and the 11th Circuit’s rejection of an EEOC challenge in Broward County v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:45 am
The IPKat does some fieldresearch into flowers ...Connoisseurs of long judgments will know that Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer Plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch) was decided last Monday, 21 May 2013, in the Chancery Division, High Court of Justice, England and Wales, by (who else?) [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:09 pm
Attinger, Adam v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm
Noting that “[v]arious situations have come to the attention of the Departments where a health insurance policy is advertised as fixed indemnity coverage” that do not “Meet the conditions for excepted benefits,” FAQ XI warns, “The Departments plan to work with the States to ensure that health insurance issuers comply with relevant requirements for different types of insurance policies and provide consumers the protections of the Affordable Care… [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am
MAY 13, 2013 Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh The undersigned parties are committed to the goal of a safe and sustainable Bangladeshi ReadyMade Garment ("RMG") industry in which no worker needs to fear fires, building collapses, or other accidents that could be prevented with reasonable health and safety measures. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:35 am
Buddy Lee Bailey v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 3:31 am
The Third Circuit’s decision in Glaxo is distinguishable from the Ninth Circuit’s position on a similar issue in Parra v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:22 am
By Nicole KilloranOCS/Pappas v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 11:16 am
Interestingly, the Volokh Conspiracy notes that the New York Supreme Court held today in Bezio v. [read post]
