Search for: "Stand Up for California! v. California"
Results 661 - 680
of 3,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
Espinosa, allowing an improperly approved bankruptcy plan for a student loan to stand because the lender waited too long to question it in court. [read post]
21 May 2010, 6:32 am
Thanks to the recent decision in Farokhzadeh v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:52 am
For example, in Ross v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:45 am
California (1975), it ruled defendants can "knowingly and intelligently" give up their right to an attorney. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
Waller v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 11:21 am
Kim v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:31 pm
The Court recognized that its decision conflicted with that of the Third District in California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:44 pm
That's the title of an OpEd by GWU Law prof Jonathan Turley in yesterday's Los Angeles Times regarding Indiana v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 5:57 am
The law was, the DMA argued, a clever way to avoid the holding in Quill v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 8:22 am
The Supreme Court has accepted a new case from California, Van de Kamp v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 9:21 am
Funnily enough, if you stole a copy of Grand Theft Auto V (set in Los Angeles) you would be charged with petty theft in Burbank. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 am
California Teachers Association. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 6:06 pm
The stay application (Hoillingsworth, et al., v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 8:52 am
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Uranium Mining; Cultural Resources Protection) Stand up for California! [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:27 pm
This type of counsel is known in California as Cumis counsel, by reference to the 1984 California intermediate appellate case of San Diego Federal Credit Union v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 3:08 am
California v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 10:02 am
In SSMiller IP LLC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
But before the Court of Appeals took up the issue as to whether the condition violated the standard the California Supreme Court articulated in People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:30 am
AmazonDid California Unintentionally (?) [read post]
