Search for: "State Road Department v. United States"
Results 661 - 680
of 908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am
G. v the United Kingdom – 37334/08 [2011] ECHR 1308 (30 August 2011) ??? [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:12 am
United States opinion last Thursday: On May 16, 2003, Solorzano Arroyo went into labor. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:45 am
That sentiment was echoed by the US First Circuit last Friday in Glik v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm
However that may be, even if in some meta-legal sense it might be “better” for the process of recognizing same-sex marriage rights to proceed state by state, legislature by legislature, or referendum by referendum, that road is now closed. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 12:01 pm
Thus would the voters of California and the taxpayers of the United States be deprived of a say in this most fundamental legal matter. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
PR (Sri Lanka) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 2) [2011] EWCA Civ 988 (11 August 2011): Court of Appeal considers application of “some other compelling reason” test for 3rd bite of cherry immigration appeals Connelly, Re Judicial Review [2011] NIQB 62 (5 August 2011): Northern Ireland High Court rejects UK court’s decision in Hookway (96 hour detention on bail case), says court “failed to recognise the context… [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am
EFFECTIVE DATE.AN ACTTo provide the Consumer Product Safety Commission with greater authority and discretion in enforcing the consumer product safety laws, and for other purposes.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD [2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin) (29 July 2011): Control order ruled lawful: “reasonable grounds for suspecting CD is a leading figure in network of Islamist extremists” – see guardian.co.uk SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 11:57 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:04 am
New York State Department of Education, decided on July 6. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:15 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
The doctrine can be traced to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in South v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:46 pm
The Department of Justice, under Georgia v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 5:00 pm
United States, 812 F.2d 1387, 1392 (1987) (emphasis added). [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:20 am
The attorney was charged with obstruction and making false statements related to a Food and Drug Administration investigation into drug promotions (United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:16 am
The United States Department of Labor's Wage and Labor Division, including minimum wage lasts, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Workers Protection Act. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:57 am
The United States Supreme Court thereafter reversed the state court. [read post]
