Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 661 - 680
of 13,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2013, 7:10 pm
Gutierrez 13-347 Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:10 pm
Citing the United States Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Three states, California, Connecticut and New York, have put such statutes into law. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
United States [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 8:32 pm
While this doesn't necessarily mean that Google will be sanctioned for the systematic deletion of company-internal chats, the plaintiffs in the Google Play antitrust case in the Northern District of California have achieved a potential breakthrough:Less than a week after the plaintiffs filed their reply brief in support of their motion for discovery sanctions, Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:51 am
In a major victory for employees, the United States Supreme Court has denied Ralphs’ Petition for Certiorari in Brown v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 2:18 pm
The case is United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 8:27 am
United Airlines (“Ward”) and Oman v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 7:05 am
" Today's ruling in Ayers v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 9:35 am
In a 7-2 decision yesterday, the United States Supreme Court sharply criticized a public-sector union for a special dues assessment. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 12:01 am
However, in Reynolds v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:50 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has held that an “insured v. insured” clause exclusion in a D&O policy for claims asserted by an insured against an insured did not preclude the insurer from paying for the entire defense costs incurred by insured and non-insured claimants. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
The respondents then attempted to satisfy the judgment by attaching accounts in the United States held by (among others) Bank Melli. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:49 pm
State of California, et al. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:33 am
” Thomas v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:14 pm
A. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:11 pm
For those keeping track of such things, United States District Court Judge Marilyn Hall Patel (Northern District of California) found "reasonable attorneys fees based on rates of $650 for partner services, $500 for associate attorney services and $150 for paralegal services. [read post]
2 May 2008, 12:20 pm
California Joint Powers Insurance Authority v. [read post]
