Search for: "State v. Armes" Results 661 - 680 of 11,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2010, 2:26 pm by tjsllibrary
Heller (2008), which held that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protected an individual right to “keep and bear arms. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:35 pm
United States Docketed: Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Case Nos.: (05-0500/NA) ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dec 22 2006 Application (06A795) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 9, 2007 to March 10, 2007, submitted to The Chief Justice. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 11:05 am by Kenneth Hall
United States [docket] on Monday, where it will determine whether a state criminal offense requiring only a slight amount of force is categorically a "violent crime" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) [materials]. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
I spent a good part of last October writing about federal preemption of state tort claims, including talking about the case of Wyeth v Levine. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
It's one thing to say, as the Court mistakenly said in Alden v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 2:27 am by Matrix LegalĀ  Information Team
The issue for the Supreme Court was whether the definition of ‘terrorism’ in the Terrorism Act 2000, s 1 includes military attacks by non-state armed groups against national or international armed groups in a non-international armed conflict. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 12:36 pm
Claims that a jury must determine his prior conviction are rejected (because of United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:57 pm by David Kopel
Upholding the decision of the district court would be consistent with precedent in other states protecting the constitutional right to bear arms. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:15 am by Jon
However, the Court has held that the feds may not commandeer the cooperation of state agents, in Mack and Printz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:59 am by Jeralyn
BTD has noted the dissent of Justice Stevens in today's decision in McDonald v. [read post]