Search for: "State v. Arnold"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2016, 4:00 am
[California v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:43 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
" Five dissents will be examined, including such seminal dissents as Justice Harlan's dissent in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
April 2017: The UK Court of Appeal is due to hand down judgment in the appeal against Arnold J’s decision. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
The AmeriKat's new tattoo Back in July last year right, at the end of the Court's Trinity Term, Mr Justice Arnold referred two questions to the CJEU on the SPC Regulation in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Comptroller-General of Patents [2016] EWHC 1896. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
HAVENNER, Appellant, v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:49 am
Since the landmark UK Supreme Court decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48), judges of the lower courts have voiced the need for clarification from the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 12:49 am
OPPO/OPPO v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 4:11 pm
The case now is pending before the Supreme Court under the name D.C. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:42 pm
Justice Arnold courtesy of the US Copyright Office who is again reviewing the problem of orphan works. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:18 am
The case is Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), yet another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, for England and Wales. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:15 am
Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:31 am
Last updated: 07/31/2022 People who follow the news in the United States are not strangers to disturbing legal stories that often dominate the headlines. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 10:04 am
Leach, Flyers Beware: The NInth Circuit Decision in United States v Arnold, Granted Customs Agents Access Into Your Laptops, 26 Cooley L Rev 307 (2009)(requires fee to access article). [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
On Monday this Kat posted "When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continued" (here), this being a short note on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of… [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:55 am
The Article III question is now the subject of a potentially landmark case, al Bahlul v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:35 pm
., v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 5:46 am
General Washington relied upon this resolution in 1780 as authority to convene a court-martial to try Joshua Hett Smith for assisting Benedict Arnold in the plot to surrender West Point to the British. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:39 pm
" Jameel Jaffer sums up the state of play in the ACLU's work to expose illegal surveillance. [read post]
