Search for: "State v. B. P." Results 661 - 680 of 6,783
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2022, 7:21 pm by Charlie Mounts
At the same time, however, employers should be aware that the McDonnell Douglas standard still applies to federal retaliation claims and some other state law retaliation claims, including Labor Code section 6310(b). [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:15 am
The OEIGWG Initiative for a conventional treaty currently being discussed at the UN does not adequately allow for what Goodman and Jinks refer to as acculturation approaches to influencing states (p. 638), depending rather on coercion and persuasion. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
You will find it stated in the law books that it is an offence to use language having a tendency to bring the Christian religion or the Bible into contempt; or to burn the Bible! [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:44 pm by admin
The Justices of that Court, however, would probably be the first to disclaim any credibility on the causes of any disease.[3] The authors further distort the notion of signature diseases by stating that “[v]aginal adenocarcinoma in young women appears to be a signature disease associated with maternal use of DES. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I often quote what I call “Roche’s dictum,” which I heard John P. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  For example, if rules specify access to a given database requires conditions A, B & C, then all the threat actor has to do is determine a way to create (or spoof) those conditions. [read post]