Search for: "State v. Barrett"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2022, 7:10 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in Moore v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 5:00 am
Justice Barrett delivered the opinion, in which Justices Roberts, Breyer, Kagan and Kavanaugh joined in full (Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
The second argument of the day will be BP PLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:02 am
In Van Buren v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 5:32 am
”Judge Easterbrook, who was appointed to the appeals court by President Ronald Reagan, relied on a 1905 Supreme Court decision, Jacobson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:13 am
In today's decision in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:23 pm
II, § 2, cl. 2)); United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Trump v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:58 pm
Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Fulton v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
The cases he cited included Brown v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:01 pm
As noted in my last post about today's Supreme Court ruling in in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 6:16 am
Barrett v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm
Anyone who believes that the Madison of 1787-88 was a devotee of "states rights" is truly illiterate. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm
Barrett cites several cases in which federal law pre-empts state family laws. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
In Sheetz v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:17 pm
The event took the form of an interview in which Barrett (the professor, not the justice) posed questions to Murray about the state of the court. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:25 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court held 5-4 in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
