Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 661 - 680 of 15,314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm by Dan Bushell
  And correspondingly, would the decision's effects extend to: (a) only civil right cases; (b) all (b)(2) classes; or (c) all class actions? [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
b) It's not at all clear why the Governor and AG need the assistance of the California courts to accomplish this task. [read post]
15 May 2014, 12:05 pm by Wells Bennett
Assuming that detainees are held in the United States by the Department of Defense pursuant to the AUMF, and that the immigration laws do not apply to their detention or subsequent transfer abroad, Guantanamo detainees relocated to the United States would not have a right to obtain the relief described in section 1039(b)(1)(A)-(C). [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 3:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Secretary of State sought to deport the defendant under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006, regs 19(3)(b) and 21. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The legislature notified the IRC of that rejection, triggering the IRC's obligation to compose — within 15 days — a second redistricting plan for the legislature's review (see NY Const, art III § 4 [b]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The legislature notified the IRC of that rejection, triggering the IRC's obligation to compose — within 15 days — a second redistricting plan for the legislature's review (see NY Const, art III § 4 [b]). [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:42 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s decision, please refer to the Court’s opinion . [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
§ 1391(c)(3) (stating that a defendant who is not a resident in the United States may be sued in any judicial district). [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Officers Benevolent Assn., Inc. v County of Westchester, 2021 NY Slip Op 04734 [04734], commenced their respective actions seeking to recover damages for the Westchester County's alleged breach of a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] based on Westchester's failure to pay certain benefits to the plaintiffs. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Officers Benevolent Assn., Inc. v County of Westchester, 2021 NY Slip Op 04734 [04734], commenced their respective actions seeking to recover damages for the Westchester County's alleged breach of a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] based on Westchester's failure to pay certain benefits to the plaintiffs. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
.: Didn’t participate in this case b/c we have members on both sides. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 8:00 am
Rost's Amended Complaint satisfies Rule 9(b)'s heightened pleading requirement [my italics]. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 3:37 am by Broc Romanek
Wal-Mart’s Impact on the “Ordinary Business Exclusion” In this podcast, Brian Breheny, Ted Yu & Hagen Ganem discuss the Third Circuit’s ruling in Trinity Wall Street v. [read post]