Search for: "State v. Catoe"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court agrees to review CRST Vans Expedited v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am
” Briefly: At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro discusses the amicus brief that Cato filed in support of a petition challenging the Supreme Court’s requirement that regulatory takings claims first be exhausted in state courts. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am
Yesterday’s oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 2:30 pm
This morning the Court heard argument in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 3:34 am
Abbott, the “one person, one vote” challenge to the state legislative maps in Texas. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 9:45 am
Harvie Wilkinson at a recent Cato event, and I appreciate Judge Kozinski's willingness to consider the question again today. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:56 am
” At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro discusses the amicus brief that Cato filed in support of the petitioners in POM Wonderful v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 am
At the Liberty Blog, Tim Sandefur discusses the amicus brief that the Pacific Legal Foundation and the Cato Institute filed in “a case involving teeth whiteners” and the question whether “‘mere protectionism’ qualif[ies] as a ‘legitimate state interest’ under the lenient ‘rational basis’ rule. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 3:47 am
” At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro and Randal John Meyer discuss the amicus brief that Cato filed in a challenge to “Colorado renewable-energy regulations” which “require that all energy that enters the state be created in compliance with certain parochial standards” – which, they contend, is “effectively . . . an extraterritorial law, regulating economic activity outside the state and thus violating the Commerce Clause. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:51 am
Professor Josh Blackman, who submittted an amicus brief supporting the challenge to the expanded deferred action program on behalf of the Cato Institute in Texas v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
The second case is Luis v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 7:04 am
State Crime Victims Bd., 502 U.S. 105, 116 (1991); Brown v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger takes a lighter look at Missud v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 10:01 pm
The doctrine stems from United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 5:57 am
In King v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:54 pm
” In Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 2:34 pm
In King v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:03 am
., office of Baker & Hostetler LLP, and Ilya Shapiro is a senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute, where Mr. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:16 am
And at Cato’s Constitution Day on September 17 I’ll be discussing my forthcoming piece on EEOC v. [read post]
