Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals"
Results 661 - 680
of 105,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2009, 12:05 am
In ACLU of Minnesota v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
Relying on State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 11:15 am
This post summarized published criminal and related decisions released by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals during February 2022. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 8:56 am
State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:57 am
State, No. 1042, September Term, 1996 (filed April 4, 1997) (affirming judgments of conviction); State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 12:15 am
First, the Court states that an agency's interpretation of its own rules is entitled to deference and a reviewing court generally will not depart from that interpretation unless it is clearly erroneous or unauthorized (citing Physicians & Surgeons Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:03 am
State (Per Curiam) - Here, the court of appeals reversed because it held that extraneous offense evidence was inadmissible to rebut a claim of recent fabrication. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am
They cite Lord Nicholls in Douglas v Hello 3 (OBG v Allan) as clearly stating that the concept of breach of confidence and misuse of private information “now covers two distinct causes of action”. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:45 am
On 13 May 2024, the UPC Court of Appeal (CoA) upheld the Munich Local Division’s decision in SES v Hanshow (UPC_CoA_1/2024) that a preliminary injunction should be refused on the basis that there was not sufficient certainty that certain models of Hanshow’s electronic label products infringe SES’ patent. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 4:44 pm
In State v Vaughn, Raymond Harvey Vaughn appeals two sentences, specifically requesting that the Utah Court of Appeals review two issues: ineffective trial counsel and illegal sentences rendered by the trial court. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:48 pm
A federal appeals court, arguing that the Supreme Court’s abortion rights rulings leave too little room for states to limit the procedure to protect fetal life, has urged the Justices to reconsider a basic idea behind Roe v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 5:16 pm
An appeals court uses the Bostock ruling to usurp state law, in a new version of Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 12:23 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, August 6, 2018, Gerson Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 5:49 am
As the Fourth District Court of Appeal's ruling in Hollingshead v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:35 am
The Court of Appeals disagrees and the state procedures remain on the books.The case is Goe v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 6:49 am
The Court of Appeal judgment The key passage of the Court of Appeal judgment is paragraph 47, which states that: … what the [Court of Justice of the European Union] has consciously done in [NS v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EUECJ C-411/10 and C-493/10] is elevate the finding of the [the European Court of Hu man Rights] that there was in effect, in Greece, a systemic deficiency in the system… [read post]
