Search for: "State v. D. M." Results 661 - 680 of 9,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2021, 8:05 am
I’d no more be locked into bad constitutional law on Roe or Casey than I would be on Dred Scott v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:55 am
However, Melody Wheeler is not the spouse of Sara Wheeler, as "[m]arriages between persons of the same sex are prohibited in this state. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 1:43 pm
  But this Ninth Circuit opinion from today hits extraordinarily close to home.It's a putative class action against USA Water Polo -- the governing body for water polo in the United States -- that alleges that USA Water Polo didn't do anything to stop its players from getting put back into games after they'd suffered a concussion. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Court explicitly recognises the applicability of Article 10 in this case : “La Cour rappelle que l’article 10 de la Convention a vocation à s’appliquer à la communication au moyen de l’Internet (..), quel que soit le type de message qu’il s’agit de véhiculer (..), et même lorsque l’objectif poursuivi est de nature lucrative (..). [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
I'm genuinely confused.I'm incredibly sympathetic with the result reached in today's opinion by Judge Kozinski. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:45 am by Meg Martin
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:09 am
I'd like to take a look at the Chief's dissent in today's Massachusetts v EPA case. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:48 am
(right:  '94 quake damage)Though I've participated (as co-mediator) in the settlement of some of these Northridge Earthquake cases, I'm going to let the insurance bloggers address the wisdom of this decision -- just sent down by the California Court of Appeal in Village Northridge Homeowners Association v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 5:20 am by Russ Bensing
  And last week, in Connick v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
 Its holding:  You overrule the prior case and make the law Y.Now, I'm not entirely sure that'd be the answer if the world (and justices) loved rule X. [read post]