Search for: "State v. Font"
Results 661 - 680
of 865
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2023, 12:29 pm
</span> </p> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> <br/> </span> </p> <h2> <span style="font-weight: bold; display: initial;"> Patent Law </span> </h2> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> <br/> </span> </p> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> … [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:44 pm
In contrast, a New York district court recently upheld an arbitration clause in Coinbase’s account registration process and granted its motion to compel arbitration concerning claims brought by a user (Sultan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:33 pm
See Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:30 am
Celine Camara, Doctoral candidate, Researcher at the Max-Planck Institute, Discrimination against Third State Nationals in Regulation 2201/2003 “Brussels II bis”. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:54 am
The seminal case on point is a U.S. decision, Bridgeman Art Library v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am
Martha Elizabeth, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 12:37 pm
Related Cases: Facebook v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:10 pm
MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:59 am
The judgment of Justice Beach in Societe Civile et Agricole du Vieux Chateau Certan v Kreglinger (Australia) Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 248 found that there was no damage, and therefore passing off was not established. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
According to the French IP code, M&S was not entitled to demand the cancellation of those goods and services not cited against it by ISMS, and therefore the claims for cancellation should be accepted as far as they apply to those goods and services cited in the infringement claim but rejected for those not so cited.On the validity of CTM 5410998 SIMPLYRecognizing the need to consider the validity of the marks by reference to the average consumer in all EU member states, the court… [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:32 am
The second scenario is where both rights fall within the hands of the same owner, as in Case C-377/05 Christian Dior v Evora. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:10 pm
Lytle v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
Wizkids/NECA, LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:07 pm
Martin Zilber v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:43 am
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 7:29 pm
And, in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
While the law of unconscionability differs a great deal from state to state, in most states it has two general components: "procedural unconscionability" (that relates to how a contract was formed), and "substantive unconscionability" (which relates to the unfairness of particular contract terms). [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
YSL v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 5:24 am
Jordan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 3:22 am
V. [read post]
