Search for: "State v. Hughes" Results 661 - 680 of 1,945
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by William Ford
Seamus Hughes dissected the unique case of Mohamed Elshinawy, the only American financed by the Islamic State to execute a terrorist attack on American soil. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 8:48 am by Howard Bashman
And at the “Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog,” Steinman has a related post titled “Hughes v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Hughes, 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
The classic floodgates argument found favour with Lord Hughes, at least to the extent that he would have confined art 3, absent alleged state complicity, to a duty to have effective systems in place to deal with art 3 ill-treatment (which he found had been breached in any event). [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am by Aurora Barnes
Hughes 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am by ELLIOT GOLD
The majority, however, buries Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [1989] AC 53 – whose public policy justifications have been inverted. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm by Aurora Barnes
Hughes 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
Hughes, 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
He stated in an interview with the CBC, “fundamentally, it’s about business models that will solve these issues”. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:40 am by IAN SKELT
They might find some consolation in Lord Hughes (from [102] onwards), who did not think that the distinction between positive acts and omissions was the sole explanation for the previous decisions protective of the police. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The US Supreme Court heard argument last month in McCoy v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
On 30 January 2018 the Court of Appeal gave the claimant permission to appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 8:05 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
At E&E News, Amanda Reilly reports that “[t]he next big Supreme Court decision affecting the scope of the Clean Water Act may come from an unlikely source: a plaintiff’s fight to reduce a prison sentence for drug and weapons possession charges,” noting that “Hughes v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 7:20 am
This distinction is shown well by the Sixth Circuit's recent decision in Hughes v. [read post]