Search for: "State v. M. T."
Results 661 - 680
of 16,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2022, 6:04 am
M P A, a citizen of Spanish nationality, and LC D N M T, a citizen of Portuguese nationality, were married on 25 August 2010 at the Spanish Embassy in Guinea-Bissau. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
to see if it could find some soft spot in Georgia state law. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 2:16 pm
But those have to be filed in the original case, not in a collateral attack, and you didn't do that.That's the argument I'm seeing, anyway. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:07 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm
Federal district court Judge Chen’s recent dismissal of the third amended complaint in Levitt v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
This week at the ACCA: The Army CCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
Microsoft didn't (as it couldn't) prevent anyone from publishing anything. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 2:51 pm
A statute requires CalTrans to sell “commercial real property acquired for the construction of a state highway, but no longer required for that purpose. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
Again, I don’t understand why M’s benefits claims are relevant to anything. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
They didn’t do this, and I’m skeptical that they could. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:40 pm
Obaidi v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 4:57 pm
KIUC is charged with nine counts each of taking threatened species in violation of 16 USC §§ 1538(a)(1)(G) and 1540(b)(1) and Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, § 17.31(c) and (a); and taking migratory birds in violation of 16 USC §§ 703(a), 707(a).I haven't had time to do more than scan it and I'm no expert at environmental law - especially endangered species (we'll learn about it together as the case progresses) - but I notice that many… [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:37 pm
Rivkin Jr. and Andrew M. [read post]
9 Aug 2004, 9:45 am
Order of August 6, 2004 in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:51 pm
T. 361, T. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 12:24 pm
As a rule, I don't write about appellate cases in which I have some involvement, on the theory that I'm not neutral, and it doesn't add much to have an advocate state whatever position they might have on an appeal that's already been adjudicated. [read post]
12 May 2020, 2:50 pm
Doesn't seem necessary.But there you have it. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
Dickinson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
