Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 661 - 680
of 4,664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2021, 2:58 am
Although even the CJEU must allow for some differences in Member State domestic laws, it is in principle able to be more pre [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
Judges are not decision-makers, so they cannot substitute their own judgment for that of the agency. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 4:13 am
InterDigital v Xiaomi (2020-21) In July 2020, the US tech company InterDigital filed suit against the Chinese consumer electronics maker Xiaomi, claiming infringement of its 3G and 4G patents, as the latter had used its technology without authorisation. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:37 am
Against the background of recent investment disputes (Philip Morris v Uruguay and Philip Morris v Australia) and recent trade agreements with ISDS norms (the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement, USMCA, and the EU/Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA), this chapter addresses the impact of ISDS on public health regulation.In Chapter 7, the author discusses how the US shaped the provisions on geographical indications in TPP-11. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
Court of Claims decision in Torncello v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 5:29 am
ZTE guidance after the Federal Court of Justice of Germany vitiated the ECJ case law in two Sisvel v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 4:42 am
” Cherry v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 10:51 am
Imagine what would happen if the "pool pressure" standard coerced a car maker into an Avanci license. [read post]
27 May 2021, 9:15 am
What We Learned From the Epic Games v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:57 am
Burgess v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 2:00 am
Perry v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 8:15 am
The case, which directly challenges Roe v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 1:14 pm
Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 2:04 pm
” Sandberg v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
The social events and legislative history leading to the enactment and promulgation of the NSL as a national law applied to the HKSAR under BL 18 have been summarised in HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying, ante. [read post]
21 May 2021, 9:12 am
Washington State Attorney General Press Release State of Washington v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:14 am
Tire maker entitled to recover on injunction bond for wrongful prohibition on sale of certain brand tires. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:14 am
Tire maker entitled to recover on injunction bond for wrongful prohibition on sale of certain brand tires. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:00 pm
Savadjian Seyfarth Synopsis: In Richardson v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:11 pm
Who ultimately overruled the initial decision-makers? [read post]
