Search for: "State v. Mark T. Smith"
Results 661 - 680
of 902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It doesn't matter what the product is (it doesn't even have to be a product). [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (Afro-IP),If education and pricing policy fail, says Adobe in Nigeria, we can still sue: (Afro-IP),South African arm of Chrysler objects to advertisement by Indian vehicle maker Mahindra and Mahindra that uses the term "jeep": (Afro-IP), (Spicy IP),Kenya’s call for anti-counterfeit legislation… amongst other changes: (Afro-IP),Kenya: Shared computer use raises privacy, confidentiality issues: (Afro-IP)AustraliaChanges to grace period for trade mark renewal:… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
Smith, 2022 WL 117763 (N.D. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
United States and Lee v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
Smith. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:27 pm
Joshi replies that the court’s precedent has suggested as much in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:09 pm
MARKS v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:37 am
Complaint, Doe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am
Mack, 49 F. 4th 941, 949 (CA5 2022) (Smith, J.) [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Our State Constitution specifies that "[t]he legislature shall provide for filling vacancies in office" (NY Const, art XIII, § 3 [emphasis supplied]), and expressly contemplates that vacancies in elective office may be filled by appointment (see id.). [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
Sadly, though, this isn't fiction. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Thanks to Restrictions, Librarians Can’t Buy Them. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:40 pm
Junior partner enlists associate who promptly types away that in the case of Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
Sackrin, Rodney Smith, Veronica A. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Tam Trust, No. 07-0970 (more info): We recently decided Smith v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:52 am
See Smith v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
