Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 661 - 680
of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2013, 3:33 am
Governor Mark Dayton signed the bill into law on the first business day following a 37-30 vote by the state senate in St. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:55 am
Regardless, the quote suggests itself as the inspiration behind the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California‘s charging decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:31 pm
The Georgia State University College of Law will hold a one-day symposium on Friday, October 23, 2009, to mark the tenth anniversary of the United States Supreme Court's integration mandate in Olmstead v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:14 pm
Case Information Marlboro Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:01 am
Ct. of Appeals Oral Arguments in Kaur v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 12:07 pm
See Suisman, Shapiro, Wool, Brennan, Gray & Greenberg P.C. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:17 am
Spireon, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:28 am
See Devicor Medical Products, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:59 pm
Today my Damon Key colleagues Mark Murakami, Christi-Anne Kudo Chock, and I filed for the Ocean Tourism Coalition a brief amicus curiae (88kb pdf) in the US Supreme Court supporting the petition for writ of certiorari filed in UFO Chuting of Hawaii, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
Topek, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
On 1 February 2023, the General Court of the EU issued two judgments (T-568/21 and T-569/21 – Zoubier Harbaoui v EUIPO) on two trade mark oppositions filed by Google with the EUIPO against the trade mark applications for the signs "GOOGLE CAR" and "GC GOOGLE CAR". [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 3:37 am
Union of India v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:51 pm
Salters v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:26 am
PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In this piece I will discuss how if at all this provision has been altered by the case of Proctor and Gamble v Office for Harmonisation In the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ; Known simply as "Baby Dry"; and subsequent cases. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
" Compare Levi Strauss v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:15 am
United States Postal Service v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:44 am
[Referring to the provisions of the Regulation that permit transfer, securitisation and licensing, the first sentence of Article 23(1) states that "... such an act, before it is so entered [in the Register of Community trade marks], shall have effect vis-à-vis third parties who have acquired rights in the trade mark after the date of that act but who knew of the act at the date on which the rights were acquired"]. [read post]
