Search for: "State v. Moore" Results 661 - 680 of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2014, 1:00 pm
Miles worked for the law firm of Moore, Schulman & Moore for four years, practicing exclusively in the area of family law. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:34 am
But now as a Justice, he doesn't need (or want) these, echoing the point that case law is the real authority to be citing, and what he needs to draft opinions.Today's DJ has Bill would force state court judges to write candidate statements: A bill proposed last week would require state Supreme Court and appellate justices to file candidate statements when standing in a retention election.Here's a blog post with Advice for lawyers preparing their first oral… [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:20 pm
The case, Greenbrier Obstetrics and Gynecology v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:05 pm
As we head into a hot holiday weekend, here are some appellate items to explore:Today's DJ has Justice Moore's piece on Jackie Robinson, United States v. 2LT Jack R Robinson as well as Marc Alexander's book review: Notorious RBG Talks Life, Love, Liberty, and LawThe Recorder's On Appeals column has Katy Graham's The Far-Reaching Effects of a Landmark Decision on the Standard of Appellate Review for Clear and Convincing… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
McClain, Against Agnosticism: Why the Liberal State Isn't Just One (Authority) Among the Many, (Boston University Law Review, Vol. 93 (December 2013)).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:John Makdisi, Uncaring Justice: Why Jacque v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:22 pm
"The New York State Constitution requires that "[a]ppointments and promotions in the civil service of the state . . . shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 8:12 pm by Gideon
Moore to dispense with the first argument: that just because state law prohibits something, doesn’t mean it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]