Search for: "State v. National Advertising Co." Results 661 - 680 of 787
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 12:13 am
They've cited, most recently, the Court's 5-4 decision this year in Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
The State's witness did not include an estimate of future income from the advertising sold on the billboard. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Guhan Subramanian has posted an interesting study of the Delaware takeover statute (§ 203), in which he and his co-authors find that “no bidder in the past nineteen years has been able to achieve 85% in a hostile tender offer against a Delaware target. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
KG v Derek Scott (PatLit) (Class 99) (IPKat) April 2010 trial ordered in trade mark infringement and copycat advertising dispute between Specsavers and Asda (IPKat) 'Give it back! [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
KG v Derek Scott (PatLit) (Class 99) (IPKat) April 2010 trial ordered in trade mark infringement and copycat advertising dispute between Specsavers and Asda (IPKat) ‘Give it back! [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
KG v Derek Scott (PatLit) (Class 99) (IPKat) April 2010 trial ordered in trade mark infringement and copycat advertising dispute between Specsavers and Asda (IPKat) ‘Give it back! [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Issue: Does the Due Process Clause or Full Faith and Credit Clause, as interpreted in Phillips Petroleum Co v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 4:38 pm by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
It should also be noted that, although the Association initially lost its tax exemption, the State of New Jersey reinstated the Association's exemption from property tax for the beach and the rest of the boardwalk, but stated that it could not continue to exempt the pavilion as it was not truly open to the public. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 6:15 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: UK government revives downloader cut-off proposal; ISPs object (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) CAFC grants Microsoft expedited patent appeal in Word case; Microsoft submits opening brief in appeal: i4i Ltd v Microsoft Corp (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (Washington State… [read post]