Search for: "State v. Necessary" Results 661 - 680 of 36,096
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 6:32 am by Mary B. McCord
“Court challenges pending on Jan. 6 really not necessary,” he wrote on Dec. 8. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
” While the state legislative season is largely over, more bans are possible, even if they aren’t that necessary. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:42 pm
Section 11(a) prohibits any registration statement that “contains an untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:45 am by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The Gomez Factors In laying out the facts of the case, the higher court noted that one case in particular, Gomez v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:07 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
Marital Misconduct and Post-Separation Support This issue was one of a few legal points discussed in the appeals case of Evans v. [read post]