Search for: "State v. Olds"
Results 661 - 680
of 20,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 11:38 am
United States), and will rule on whether a jury or a judge should decide the right of an owner of an older trademark to update it and still keep its legal status (Hana Financial v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 10:54 am
The states are bound by the federal retroactivity standard the Court laid down in Teague v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:32 am
Castro v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
That question has come up in a case in which New Jersey sought to repeal some of its old gambling laws. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
Cites to Doe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 2:20 pm
Waldrip v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:34 am
In D.A. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 5:14 pm
You'll be hearing a lot about that old 1985 case in the coming weeks. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:51 am
The case of Carmer v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 7:32 am
[The middle ground in Moore v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:26 pm
(There’s a case on that, U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:37 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 2:39 pm
The action now moves to the states, where many legislatures are expected to consider new abortion restrictions and strengthen old ones. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:36 pm
Gregory Earl Pollard v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:48 am
Dunn is an English case that’s almost 120 years old. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
It is losing states faster than it is gaining them: in the last few years, Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, Nevada, and New Mexico rescinded Article V applications for causes ALEC is promoting; Illinois, New Jersey, and Oregon rescinded unrelated old applications after ALEC-aligned groups claimed those could somehow be counted to reach the necessary 34 states. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Cash v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:32 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
One was whether the Court had jurisdiction to review a collateral state court’s decision not to apply Miller v. [read post]
