Search for: "State v. Oxford"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,741
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2018, 9:58 am
The Court’s upcoming ruling in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am
The Opponents had raised objections on the grounds of Articles 100(a) and (b) EPC.The evidence cited during the opposition procedure includesD1: WO 2007/087243 A2;D2: WO 2004/041982 A1;D3: EP 1 867 708 A1;D4: V. [read post]
21 May 2018, 7:15 am
Here is a summary of the book, provided by the publisher (Oxford University Press): When we think of constitutional law, we invariably think of the United States Supreme Court and the federal court system. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:06 pm
See McCleskey v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 5:00 am
The petition for certiorari argues that the Ninth Circuit decision was contrary to the Court’s reasoning in Stolt-Nielsen as well as Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:42 pm
Most authoritatively, the CJEU in L’Oreal v eBay states that a host that has acted non-neutrally in relation to certain data cannot rely on the hosting protection in the case of those data (judgment, para [116]). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:29 am
" Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the UK (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaqonly a provisional conclusion). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 7:23 am
Erskine's position was quoted by the defense in the 1806 case United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:16 am
As I explained in my post about Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
This willingness of states and other public organs to delegate is especially potent with respect to rules states are unwilling or incapable of adopting through traditional assertions of public authority. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
United States, 480 U.S. 522–526 (1987) (per curiam)); see also Henson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 11:00 am
Ruggiu (2000), Prosecutor v, Kupreskic (2000), Prosecutor v Blaskic (2000), the Medi [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
It focuses not on what a lawyer does or accomplishes, but rather on what the lawyer feels, on her state of mind in relation to the client’s cause. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:01 am
The amendments are mainly to reflect the Court of Appeal’s decisions in the recent cases of Dawson-Damer and others v Taylor Wessing LLP [2017] EWCA Civ 74 and Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Company Ltd and Deer v University of Oxford [2017] EWCA Civ 121. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
The Socially Aware blog has commented on the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am
In 2021 and 2022, several provisions are scheduled to take effect which would raise taxes on business investment in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:31 pm
") (emphasis added); Oxford American Dictionary at 109 (Oxford Univ. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 5:45 pm
[xi] These numbers are even greater in European markets where state funded healthcare is far more comprehensive. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:52 pm
The book, Responsible Enterprise (Munich: CH Beck, Oxford, Hart, 2018), is authored by Birgit Spiesshofer, who has worked as a lawyer who since 2002 has served, inter alia, as Chair of the CSR committees of the International Bar Association, the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe, and the German Lawyers Association. [read post]