Search for: "State v. Padilla"
Results 661 - 680
of 786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2010, 9:53 am
United States, there are only four cases undecided from the October sitting: United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 6:17 am
The seminal case is Dumorange v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 4:54 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
In State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:51 am
News: McCALLUM v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm
Padilla, 542 U.S. 426 (2004)) and who, as a veteran, may not be a huge fan of a provision stating that the Third Geneva Convention won't support a habeas petition. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
------- Title: Padilla v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
Honorable Mentions Cases Padilla v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
., v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:02 pm
., v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 4:07 pm
08-651 PADILLA V. [read post]
New York Appellate Criminal Cases Originating from the New York Supreme Court NY County - LexisNexis
15 Dec 2009, 12:50 pm
People v Padilla, 1712, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 9144; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:02 pm
Padilla. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:12 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:35 pm
On October 13, 2009, the Supreme Court heard oral argument for Padilla v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
In the National Law Journal, Tony Mauro describes the similarities between the recent "Balloon Boy" incident in Colorado and the pending Supreme Court case, Padilla v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:23 am
Kronk's ex-wife (and a Chief in the United States Coast Guard), who states (1) he was interested in fanta [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
On Tuesday, October 13, 2009, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Padilla v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 8:10 am
†The Legal Intelligencer has an article on the University of Pennsylvania Law School’s Supreme Court clinic’s role in Padilla v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:01 am
In the 7-4 decision, the Court of Appeals cites executive authority and national security concerns in declining to extend Bivens liability in this context.The case is Arar v. [read post]
