Search for: "State v. Personnel Housing" Results 661 - 680 of 1,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
.: The House Armed Services Committee's Future of Defense Task Force will hold its inaugural hearing on theories of victory. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Discuss the accident only with the ambulance and medical personnel, your attorney and with representatives of your insurance company. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 2:37 pm by Allison Murphy, Scott R. Anderson
Instead, the White House has limited public disclosure of the report to a cover letter indicating that the document has been transmitted to Congress. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by James W. Ward
Expanding Statute of Limitations for FEHA Claims: Someone alleging violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) currently has one year to file a complaint with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH). [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 7:06 pm by Jackie McDermott
Department of Veterans Affairs, violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by showing that age tainted their personnel decisions. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by JB
Lash has a sixty-page selection of post-ratification materials, including, for example, The Slaughter-House Cases and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
He recently appeared as a witness before a Subcommittee of the House Homeland Security Committee on “Silent Weapons: Examining Foreign Anomalous Health Incidents Targeting Americans In The Homeland And Abroad”. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am by R. Scott Adams
By the end of August 2021 DOD had evacuated over 120,000 people, which included not just SIV applicants but others at risk as well, 74,000 of which were housed on DOD installations in the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:44 am by David Urban
  But if an employee spends too much time at work talking with co-workers about non-work-related matters, including religion, then this can be addressed as a violation of the personnel rule. [read post]