Search for: "State v. Pounds"
Results 661 - 680
of 3,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2007, 8:46 am
As Justice Brandeis noted, in his famous dissent in New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 7:02 pm
While dismissing the divorce petition filed in B.S. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
In particular he stated that 'there was no suggestion from either party that the Shanks patents were crucial to Unilever’s success. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
The publishers will pay all of Prince Harry’s legal costs, plus around £300,000 extra in damages. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
The decision was, nevertheless, controversial as the all the claimants were awarded more than the previous highest damages in a privacy case (the £60,000 paid to Max Mosley in 2008. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
CTE were also given £350k by each of the councils. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
CTE were also given £350k by each of the councils. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:00 am
Aeroground Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
The claimant was successful in all four cases Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB) – damages of £37,500 Monir v Wood [2018] EWHC 3525 (QB) – damages of £40,000 Burgon v News Group Newspapers [2019] EWHC 195 (QB) – damages of £30,000 Fentiman v Marsh [2019] EWHC 2099 (QB)) – damages of £55,000. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 9:20 pm
Rimer LJ stated that the conclusion of the judge below was that Dr Elithorn acquired no beneficial interest, but remained indebted to the estate for £125,000. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
Moreover, he stated that pocket money for her children was not “an essential expenditure” and she could “make further savings on this expenditure of £;100-£120 a month. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 4:25 pm
The judge awarded Mr Monir £40,000 in damages and costs, and said in his judgment: “It needs to be stated clearly: Mr Monir is completely innocent. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
EME Homer City[1] and Seventh, United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
Just one week before, however, we had discussed Rescuecom v Google (...), a case where the United Stated Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit come to the opposite conclusion on the exact same facts. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 12:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:37 am
Mr Luckhurst applied for a variation to the restraint order so that he could pay £3,000 for legal representation in respect of the civil proceedings. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:54 am
So Mrs Gow appealed to the Supreme Court for reinstatement of her award of £39,500. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
If Samsung (or Apple) appeal, payment of the £1.05 billion damages figure will be stayed pending the appeal, though interest will accrue. [read post]
