Search for: "State v. Priest"
Results 661 - 680
of 722
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2009, 12:49 pm
One of the most fascinating things about practicing mass tort litigation is when these cases intersect with international law and policy, as they did recently in O'Bryan v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:20 pm
In Joaquin M. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 8:38 pm
Rodearmel, (Rodearmel v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:01 pm
The court therefore concluded that the benefit of suppression would be marginal or nonexistent and that the evidence was admissible under the good-faith rule of United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
I want to gouge my eyes out after reading the comments. posted at Liz - Not Ranting, Just Saying., we get a discussion of a case where the woman who reported rape to the university was pushed by university employees to drop the charges.In 43 Alaskan Native Americans File Suit Against Jesuits for Rape, Sexual Assault; Alaska Was Catholic Church's Dumping Grounds for Rapist Priests posted at Women's Space, we get a discussion of widespread abuse committed by priests who… [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 11:34 pm
In Community Economic Development, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:56 am
A 1983 Irish Law Reform Commission Report on Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Jactitation of Marriage and Related Rights cites the 1820 English case of Lord Hawke v Corri (1820), 2 Hag. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 11:33 pm
Here is the abstract:Like Bush v Gore in the United States, the decision of Justice Nicholson in Jacob Zuma v National Director of Public Prosecution will undoubtedly be seen as a pivotal case in South Africa's political history. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:45 am
In O'Bryan v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
Preston and Rex v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:06 pm
" Doe v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 11:55 am
Church leaders believe that, despite warnings, many priests are being duped into performing marriages of convenience.Meanwhile the issue was complicated last month when the House of Lords issued a decision in R (on the application of Baiai and others) v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 12:03 pm
Priest, 21 U.S.C.M.A. 564, 570, 45 C.M.R. 338, 344 (1972).See United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2008, 10:15 pm
In State of Ohio v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:07 am
This hypothetical with its permutations illustrates the difficulty in stating hard-fast rules. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
Citing McDaniel v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:26 pm
Those cases have never - despite Boerne v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 10:55 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Sharon Yates v. [read post]
