Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 661 - 680
of 71,790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Epstein, The History of Public Utility Rate Regulation in the United States Supreme Court: Of Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory RatesAngela R. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
Ramey - 2011-R-0094You asked for a summary of the Connecticut Supreme Court's decision in Raftopol v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:38 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:16 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 1:15 pm
Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC), Judge Paul Michel and former U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 4:24 pm
R. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 6:20 am
The complaint, in Araujo v Bryant, points out that the Mississippi Constitution requires schools to be under the supervision... [read post]
15 May 2011, 6:28 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 10:09 am
R (Kiana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2010) QBD(Admin) 20/04/2010. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 10:09 am
R (Kiana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2010) QBD(Admin) 20/04/2010. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm
In the case of R (o.t.a P & others) v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
R (T) v (1) Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, (2) Secretary of State for the Home Department (Secretary of State for Justice an interested party) [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) – read judgment. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:12 am
On examining the authorities relied upon in the Court of Appeal (R v Ngyuen [2008] EWCA Crim 585 and R v O’Dowd [2009] EWCA Crim 905), the Court did not consider that there was any clear definitive statement on the issue now raised. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:38 am
England v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 7:10 am
Today's ruling issued in John R. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:33 am
Judge Howell’s order in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:13 am
BETTE R. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:18 am
R. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:53 pm
Contrary to the Claimant’s arguments, R v Isington London Borough Council ex parte Reilly and Mannix (1998) 31 HLR 651, and R (on the application of Lin) v Barnet London Borough Council [2007] EWCA (Civ) 132 do not establish that such a policy must be incorporated into the scheme itself to meet s.167(8). [read post]
