Search for: "State v. Sam"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
The agency found the protester ineligible for award because the protester was not registered in SAM when it submitted its Phase I proposal. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
The South East Counter Terrorism Unit used a Production Order under the Terrorism Act to obtain the laptop after he interviewed a British-born Islamic State fighter. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:41 pm
For example: Nero v Law Off. of Sam Streeter, P.L.L.C., 655 F Supp 2d 200, 209 [EDNY 2009], as amended (Dec. 4, 2009) ("With respect to plaintiff's § 1692e(10) claim, again, plaintiff failed to alert the court to any representations by Streeter Law that it is licensed in New York City or that it has the legal authority to litigatein the courts of this state. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:10 am
This follows his earlier judgment in Teva v Novartis ([2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat)). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:22 pm
Some might see state-by-state difference as a sign of healthy experimentation. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 10:51 am
As Burkle v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
Blake State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 1 – Corinne Tobeck State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 2 – Uncontested State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 1 – Mary Helen Roberts State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 2 – Marko Liias State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 1 – Steve Robinson State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 2 – Sam Hunt / Chris Reykdal State Representative Dist. 23, Pos. 1 – Sherry… [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:29 am
In the Board’s 2012 decision of Research in Motion Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:17 am
Potter Stewart wrote an opinion in the 1974 case of Geduldig v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
Hold the Front Page published a comment on the Millett v Corbyn case by Sam Brookman. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 10:50 am
Sincerely, Steven V. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:00 pm
-Corpus Christi 2007, orig. proceeding [mand. denied]) (holding that an oral motion to enforce a settlement agreement was sufficient because "[a]s long as the motion recites the terms of the agreement, states that the other party has revoked its previously stated consent to the agreement, and requests the trial court to grant relief, the motion is sufficient"); Bayway Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:57 am
Briefly: In Forbes, Kashmir Hill discusses a recent decision by a federal magistrate judge who declined to wait for the Court to issue its decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:23 am
Here's an excerpt from the Berkman Center press release: The Citizen Media Law Project (CMLP), with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Public Citizen, submitted an amicus curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, urging the court to apply First Amendment scrutiny to the recently resurgent “hot news misappropriation” doctrine in Barclays Capital, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:56 pm
US v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:11 am
Wyly v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:15 pm
The Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:28 am
See New York Times Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:15 am
Eight years later, in Aguilar v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 3:33 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Jasper Tran and Cameron Baker write that Allen v. [read post]
