Search for: "State v. South" Results 661 - 680 of 11,252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2011, 10:00 am by J
That second claim is now been decided: Cala Homes (South) Ltd v (1) Secretary of State (2) Winchester City Council [2011] EWHC 97 (Admin). [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:28 am by Robert D. Williams
The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:34 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Important non-patent Supreme Court case for businesses operating online: South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:04 am by J
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State (No.2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639 is one that we may have missed when it first came out (or we decided not to do it – we can’t quite remember now), but, given that I have some free time this morning, I thought I’d do a short note on it. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Joint Underwriting Association, et al., No. 27484 (Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina, Jan. 21, 2015). [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:21 pm by Cecere Santana, P.A.
The post State Supreme Court Rules for Defendant in Boating Accident Case appeared first on South Florida Injury Attorneys Blog. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 6:20 am
Vines, the defendant has made a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, citing Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
  He then examined our own rich jurisprudence on the issue – the leading case being Independent Newspapers v Minister for Intelligence. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:25 am by Allan Blutstein
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
In OW and OV v Members of the Board of the Wesley Mission Council, (NSWADT, Dec. 10, 2010), the Administrative Decisions Tribunal of the Australian state of New South Wales held that the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination Act does not require a religiously-sponsored social service organization to approve same-sex couples as foster care providers. [read post]