Search for: "State v. Superior Court"
Results 661 - 680
of 11,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm
The trial judge had him at $60 an hour and the Superior Court is signaling “too much! [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 4:53 am
In Vaughn Development v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 11:42 am
Decision: Rutolo v Northey [read post]
29 May 2019, 10:50 am
On appeal, the Superior Court reversed and remanded. [read post]
3 May 2017, 1:06 pm
Superior Court (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 1042.) [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:49 am
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443, discussed here.Our post on the Ninth Circuit's decision in the underlying matter, Laster v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:13 am
The case is State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:07 am
I am currently in the process of drafting an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
In Exide Technologies v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 12:15 am
In July, California Secretary of State Shirley Weber filed a petition for a writ of supersedeas in the California Court of Appeal with respect to the trial court's judgment in Crest v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 1:07 pm
This decision further confirms the trend of state courts recognizing the potential for coverage where many federal courts have not. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:57 pm
Bunnell v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:42 am
The defendants are seventeen state defendants, including twelve state legislators, one Superior Court judge, one appellate clerk, the New London Superior Court, the 'Connecticut Court of Appeals,' and the State of Connecticut (state defendants), and one private defendant, the Connecticut Medical Insurance Company (insurance company). [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 12:00 am
Superior Court, ___ Cal.4th ___ (April 12, 2012) [Slip Opn., at 1, 4]. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:02 am
Instead, the Supreme Court, referencing its previous opinion in Hill v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:46 pm
The first was "negligent marketing," which the Superior Court limited strictly to overpromotion:Appellant next argues that her claim for “negligent marketing” is cognizable under Baldino v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:18 am
On February 4, 2013 the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Auer v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 9:38 am
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:15 am
On March 15, 2010, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, decided the case of State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
P1–10–1155A (Rhode Island Superior Court 2012). [read post]
