Search for: "State v. Trader" Results 661 - 680 of 862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2009, 5:38 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) Taking action against eBay fakes - Trader Bhavin Shah sentenced to 270 hours community service following successful prosecution by Trading Standards - what else can trademark owners do to protect their brands? [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:45 am
Traders in beverages - particularly alcoholic beverages - like to associate in the mind of the consumer, their product with unspoilt wilderness, highland areas, of rugged and manly pursuits such as hunting game. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:22 pm
558/08 Portakabin Ltd and Portakabin BV v Primakabin BV, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands).Portakabin Ltd, who made and sold mobile buildings, owned the Benelux trade mark PORTAKABIN for goods in Classes 6 (metal buildings, parts and building materials) and 19 (non-metal buildings, parts and building materials). [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
Baring’s chief Singapore trader, Nick Leeson, bought several exchange-traded futures contracts based on the Nikkei average and traded on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O)    Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat)  … [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
, (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (more from Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (Harold Wegner), Global101 reasons for not selling your unused trade marks: (IPKat),ICANN to battle domain name tasting: (Trademark Blog), (related coverage from Trademark Blog),Is a patent a monopoly? [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:00 pm
United States) which held that Commerce's CVD/NME methodology violated US law. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:32 am by Gilles Cuniberti
This means that the intended objective will not be achieved and, in certain cases, that consumer protection is sacrificed in favour of traders’ interests. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:09 am
In affirming the 2nd District Court of Appeal's decision in Marathon Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:28 am
[In the following post, our guest contributor Rahul Singh analyzes the impact of CCI’s order in Builders Association of India v. [read post]