Search for: "State v. Word" Results 661 - 680 of 40,617
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:53 am by Chris Castle
And if you think that Israel is having a hard time with “Palestinian peaceful protesters”. just wait until China invades Taiwan and the word goes out from TikTok to Gaza by the Potomac to start condemning the Taiwanese breakaway province and imperialist protectorate of the evil United States. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
(Or at least the best one that doesn't take up 20,000+ words.)The California Supreme Court has to wade into all this in deciding this opinion, which holds that, in this particular context, the required mental state of "knowing" is belied by a good faith belief in the legality of one's conduct. [read post]
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:44 am by Eric Goldman
If public health is not within the portfolio of the city manager, then neither the post nor the deletions would be traceable to Freed’s state authority—because he had none Notice the court’s use of slippery words like “bailiwick” and “portfolio. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:13 am by SHG
The Supreme Court, in its recent Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
The court doesn’t acknowledge the cases saying that 512(f) preempts state law claims. [read post]