Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice"
Results 661 - 680
of 711
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
Justice David Souter, writing the majority opinion for the United States Supreme Court, upheld Exxon's liability for the incident, but found the $2.5 billion excessive. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:46 am
The Department of Justice of the United States is wellaware of these proceedings and has not chosen to seek ourintervention. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 2:39 am
Texas had the opportunity to follow the Oklahoma model, noted in Justice Stevens' concurring opinion in Medellin v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 3:31 pm
Medellin anyway, taking the decision out of Congress’ hands and placing the United States irrevocably in breach. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:23 pm
The Justice Department, although failing to get the case dismissed, seemed to indicate that it does not intend to challenge that part of the ruling in the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
The remainder of the interpretive dispute between Justice Scalia and Justice Stevens is about the semantic content of the operative clause itself. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:29 pm
" In an opinion joined by Justice Stevens, Justice Alito dissented. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
United States (2005) - felon firearm possession ban doesn't cover foreign convictionsTennessee v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:59 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States decided United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:57 am
United States (1983), and Young v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
The decision came on a 7-2 vote in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 4:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
They were both written by the Chief Justice of the court. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:48 pm
Executions in the United States had been on hold since last September, when the Court decided to take on the case of Baze v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:00 am
. ____ (2008) STEVENS, J., concurring in judgment SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 07-5439 RALPH BAZE AND THOMAS C. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Today's Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:04 am
In the second grant Monday, the Court agreed to hear a Justice Department appeal in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
UNITED STATES, No. 09-102JUSTICE KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court, joined by Justices Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, and ClintonJust seven years ago, this Court proclaimed: "Liberty protects the person from unwarranted government intrusions into a dwelling or other private places. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:25 am
Corp. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
§337(a), which explicitly provides that all enforcement of the FDCA "shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
