Search for: "Stone v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 1,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm by Ryan Emenaker
Yet, out of the 89,476 jurisdictions in the United States, only about 12,000 (13.4%) are “covered” jurisdictions. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:47 am by S2KM Limited
Furman prior to the voluntary dismissal of the ELNY class action lawsuit, attorney Roger Christensen quoted from the 1964 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Donovan v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:25 am by Eric
 First, all governments are pro-censorship, and that certainly includes the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:45 am
Interestingly though, the Internal Revenue Service found recourse not in the Internal Revenue Code, but under Title 31 of the United States Code in Tyler. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 3:13 pm by S2KM Limited
In conclusion, it should also be noted that ELIC-related litigation continued in 2012 (Garamendi v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
The Slater v Condappa case - see above. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 9:19 am by Florian Mueller
But Motorola doesn't want this to happen in the United States, and especially not in a way that takes care of the FRAND licensing question on a worldwide basis.Motorola's Wisconsin motion wasn't sealed, but Apple's response, filed on Friday at Judge Crabb's request, is inaccessible to the public. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 10:25 am by Kenneth Anderson
The three WaPo stories, titled “The Permanent War,” address war-making aspects of counterterrorism – the drone wars and targeted killing, forward bases for drones in increasingly far-flung places, and (though with much less discussion) military and intelligence advisors to local governments dealing with various non-state actor groups that have both domestic and transnational aspects. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am by Gideon
United States, the Rehnquist court wrote: In United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
 The Washington Post quotes the investigation as stating that “Huawei and ZTE have failed to assuage the committee’s significant security concerns presented by their continued expansion into the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm by David Bernstein
United States (invalidating a law banning employers from prohibiting their employees from joining unions) and Adkins v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Maritime Law Staff
It is days like today that makes me proud to be a member of the United States Navy and this coalition. [read post]