Search for: "Street v. Second Court of Appeals"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2018, 9:08 am
The case is King v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 7:09 am
Although the district court refused to award any attorneys’ fees to the first officer, whose retaliation claim against his supervisor was the only claim to get to a jury, the appeals court now revived two claims, and if either a trial or a settlement resulted in more than nominal damages, the attorneys’ fee analysis would need to be revisited as well (Robinson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:28 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit and later at the Supreme Court, clerking for Justice Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm
” In a shocking development, in 2016, the Court of Appeals upheld the injunction. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
Justin Mack for the Indianapolis Star and Ron Maxey for Memphis Commercial Appeal cover Judge Amy Coney Barrett. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 9:47 am
Florida’s First District Court of Appeal upheld action from Gov. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 9:47 am
Florida’s First District Court of Appeal upheld action from Gov. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:44 am
Quinta Jurecic investigated the role of the Supreme Court ruling in Korematsu v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 7:24 am
The Regeneron v Kymab battle continues in the UK courts. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm
Yes, because the yellow cabs and the Uber cars are not "similarly-situated," meaning the government can treat them differently.The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Sack and Parker) details how the yellow cabs differ from the Uber cars. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 10:59 am
The Supreme Court in Nelson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:29 am
For the first time, the Second Circuit (Katzmann, Walker and Pooler) holds that excessive force claims under the Fourteenth Amendment are resolved under an objective standard, a holding arising from the Supreme Court's ruling in Kingsley v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:41 am
Contrary to the petitioner’s allegations, this Court did not find that Mall’s property, Lot 24, is completely inaccessible from the street. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
In Crisp v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:23 pm
As Collins J said in R v Newham LBC ex parte Begum the court will not unreasonably enforce the duty. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 pm
Second, the Court addressed Virginia’s use of Pennsylvania v. [read post]